检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘宇 戴东凯[1] 伏思华[1] 马丽衡 王省书[1]
机构地区:[1]国防科学技术大学光电科学与工程学院,湖南长沙410073
出 处:《光学与光电技术》2017年第6期77-83,共7页Optics & Optoelectronic Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(61573368)资助项目
摘 要:星敏感器是一种高精度姿态测量设备,被广泛应用于航天、航空、舰船等领域,其性能主要取决于内参数的标定精度。选用何种标定方法完成内参数的标定以及如何提高内参数的标定精度是星敏感器实现高精度姿态测量的关键。针对现有的依赖姿态解算的标定方法与不依赖姿态解算的标定方法进行了相应研究,通过采用网格状星图分析了两类标定方法的噪声特性,同时对比研究了两类标定方法在不同星点数目、不同星点分布下的标定情况。仿真结果表明:星点数目越多内参数的标定精度越高,星点分布越均匀内参数的标定精度越高,且在同等情况下依赖姿态解算的标定方法的精度要优于不依赖姿态解算的标定方法。Star sensor is a high-precision attitude measuring device, which is widely used in aerospace, aviation, ship and other fields. Its performance depends mainly on the calibration accuracy of internal parameters. Therefore, how to choose the calibration method to complete the calibration of internal parameters and how to improve the calibration accu racy of internal parameters is the key of star sensor to achieve high-precision attitude measurement. The calibration methods based on attitude solution or not are researched in this paper. The noise characteristics of the two calibration methods are analyzed by using a grid star map, and the two calibration methods under different star number and differ- ent star distribution are compared. The simulation results show that the more the number of star points, the higher the calibration accuracy of the internal parameters, the more uniform distribution of star pointis, the higher the calibration accuracy of the internal parametersis. In the same case, the accuracy of the calibration method depending on attitude calculation is better than that of not depending on attitude calculation.
分 类 号:V241.623[航空宇航科学与技术—飞行器设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177