论行政权对司法权的侵蚀——以刑事司法中行政鉴定的乱象为切入  

On the Erosion of Judicial Power by Administrative Power: From the Perspective of the Chaos of Administrative Appraisal in Criminal Justice

作　　者：罗翔[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2018年第1期56-67,共12页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

基　　金：中国政法大学校级课题"犯罪构成与证明责任"(10813353)

摘　　要：行政机关经常以行政鉴定的名义侵蚀司法权,导致司法权的割裂。行政鉴定是对事实问题的专业判断,而非对违法性问题的法律意见。司法权不能过于被动,不能仰赖于行政权,它应当有所作为。在刑事司法中应当严格区分行政认定和行政鉴定,建立合理的行政鉴定程序,取消"必须性的行政鉴定",慎重对待行政机关出具的检验报告,提高司法的主动性。Administrative organs often erode judicial power in the name of administrative appraisal, leading to the fragmentation of judicial power. Administrative appraisal is a professional judgment on factual issues rather than legal opinions on illegal issues. Judicial power can neither be too passive nor rely on the executive power. Instead, it should make a difference. In criminal justice, administrative identification and administrative appraisal should be strictly distinguished to establish a reasonable administrative appraisal procedure and abolish the necessary administrative appraisals. The inspection reports issued by administrative organs should be treated with caution and the judicial initiative should be enhanced.

关 键 词：行政权 司法权 行政鉴定 司法鉴定 

分 类 号：DF3[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]