检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪庆华[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学
出 处:《浙江社会科学》2018年第1期49-56,共8页Zhejiang Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金项目(11BFX092)的阶段性成果
摘 要:在各种信访中,对生效裁判不服的申诉、对法院其他工作的投诉、对司法工作人员的举报,被看成是涉诉信访。对涉诉信访的产生、现状和应对,学术界多有着墨,但是对于如何通过司法的手段回应信访、上访者如何被建构成法律秩序的挑战者、国家如何通过司法的手段治理上访,则是以往研究忽略的领域。根据源于中国裁判文书网375个因上访而以寻衅滋事罪定罪处罚的刑事案件分析可知,上访者已经成为了刑事治理的对象,他们成为了刑法惩治的目标。2013年后的这一政策转型使得信访治理发生了一个实质的转变,从权利救济、社会治安问题转化成刑事犯罪。这一政策转型能否有效解决基层政府权威流失和访民社会动员威胁问题,仍然有待进一步观察。Law-related Petition includes petition of decisions of the court, complaints of the works of the court and informing of the misdemeanors of the judges. As to its origin, reality, and response, there are lots of researches. When it comes to how the judiciary responds the petition, how the petitioner was constructed as challengers of legal order, and how the state materializes social governance by the judiciary,there are few. Petition has turned into a reproduction mechanism of stigmatization of petitioners. Through the analysis of 375 petition-related picking quarrel criminal cases, the petitioners have been changed into the objects of criminal punishment. This represents a dramatic change of petition policy. Rights relief has turned into criminal offenses. Whether this policy change could resolve the authority erosion of local governments and threats of petitioners' mobilization needs further observations.
分 类 号:D922.182[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.85