检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东中医药高等专科学校学工处,山东烟台264199 [2]烟台大学经济管理学院,山东烟台264005
出 处:《乐山师范学院学报》2017年第12期109-114,135,共7页Journal of Leshan Normal University
摘 要:文章对在韩中国留学生和在中韩国留学生的压力应对方式与心理幸福感的关系进行了比较研究,为更好地服务于两国留学生的精神健康提供理论依据。对641名中韩留学生进行问卷调查的结果表明:中国留学生倾向于问题指向应对方式,而韩国留学生更多采用于幻想应对方式;心理幸福感测量显示韩国留学生的心理幸福感高于中国留学生;中韩两国留学生的心理幸福感都与问题指向应对和寻求社会支持应对有着较高的相关关系,寻求社会支持对中国留学生的心理幸福感影响更大,而问题指向应对对韩国留学生的影响更大。This study aims to provide theoretical bas is for a better mental health service to overseasstudents by comparing the relationship between stress-coping styles and psychological well-being of Chinese students in Korea and Korean students in China. A survey was conducted among 641 Chinese studentsin Korea and Korean students in China, and the results indicated that Chinese students in Korea tended tobe problem-focused in settling stress while the Korean students in China would adopt a settlement of hallucination; the level of psychological well-being for Chinese students was lower than that of Korean students;and psychological well-being presented strong correlativity with problem-focused response and social-support response of Chinese students and Korean students, that is, the social -support response has a greaterimpact on the psychological well-being of Chinese overseas students, while the problem-focused responseon the Korean students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117