网络问责中的抗争表演与法律反制——一种抗争政治学的分析  

Contentious Performance and Legal Countermeasure in Internet Accountability——An Analysis of Contentious Politics

作　　者：刘力锐 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院马克思主义学院,北京102448 [2]浙江行政学院公共管理教研部,浙江杭州311121

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第1期52-58,共7页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年资助项目(13CZZ059);浙江省社会科学重点研究基地"浙江省科学发展观与浙江发展研究中心"资助项目(12JDZL03)

摘　　要：网络问责是社会行动者通过互联网平台对公共权力进行的监督、问责行为,它具有鲜明的抗争属性。社会行动者往往需要依赖网络表演来汇聚抗争力量,有效的问责表演必须满足公众需求、媒体需求和官方需求。权力主体借用权利理由和秩序理由,引入法律武器形成对网络问责的强力反制。权力主体应对网络问责的行为策略是由公共权力类型决定的,公共权力的强大和公民权利保障的不完善导致了网络问责法律反制的盛行。法律武器滥用会导致社会的寒蝉效应,保障公民权利和规范公共权力是网络问责稳健发展乃至互联网治理现代化的关键。Internet accountability refers to social actors' supervision and accountability on public power through the Internet platform,which has the basic attributes of contentious politics.Social actors often need to rely on Internet performance to gather the power of protest,and effective accountability must meet the needs of the public,the media and the officials.Power actors introduce legal weapons to take a strong counter against Internet accountability by resorting to the logic of rights and order.The tactics of power actors to deal with Internet accountability are determined by the types of public power,so the mightiness of public power and the imperfection of civil rights protection lead to the legal rebellion of Internet accountability.The abuse of legal weapons would result in the chilling effect of society,and protecting the rights of citizens and regulating public power is the key to the rapid development of Internet accountability and even the modernization of Internet governance.

关 键 词：网络问责 抗争政治 抗争表演 法律反制 互联网治理 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]