检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《行政与法》2018年第1期75-87,共13页Administration and Law
摘 要:有限责任公司股东的资产收益权是其一项最基本的权利,然而在商业实践中,很多中小股东的收益权得不到保障,目前法律赋予的救济途径又过于狭窄。法律应当在公司自治和司法公平正义之间找到平衡,给予股东适当的保护,而强制盈余分配请求之诉则是最佳途径。《公司法司法解释(四)》第45条规定的股东强制盈余分配之诉应予以肯定性评价,唯此类诉讼的实体要件和程序要件需要进一步明晰。For the shareholders of limited liability companies,gaining the asset return from company is a basic tight.But in business practices,many small and medium-sized shareholders get oppression from the controlling shareholders,so that it would break the tight of gaining return.Furthermore the current law doesn't give appropriate remedy to the sharehold- ers.The law should find the balance of autonomy of the company and the judicial justice ,give the shareholders appropri- ate way to remedy.Giving the shareholders tight to bring the action of mandatory distribution of dividends is the best way.The fourth judicial interpretation of company law (the draft) has mentioned this kind of lawsuit,we should criticize it favorably.But this regulation is too obscure;some substantive and procedural requirements are not mentioned and needed to be clarifying.
关 键 词:强制盈余分配请求权 公司自治 司法介入 诉讼条件
分 类 号:D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171