数据的稳定性与直接性——析彼得·伽里森关于实验的客观性  

The Stableness and Directness of Data:On Peter Galison's Experimental Objectivity

作　　者：王延锋[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学科学史与科学文化研究院,上海200240

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2018年第1期106-111,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"实验与科学的合理性研究"(17BZX038)

摘　　要：假说在多大程度上影响实验与观察,以及实验能否对假说起到判决性作用,科学哲学界一直存在争议。伽里森(Peter Galison)力图超越传统的"理论—实验"二维分析模式,提出仪器和技术的发展在实验过程中起到关键性作用。新仪器和技术使数据呈现"直接性"和"稳定性",是实验结果得到公认,假说得到判决的重要原因。通过仪器、技术方法和计算模型的不断改进,尽力排除背景干扰,提供直接性和稳定性的实验结果是实验科学家追求的共同目标。It is in debating that in what extent a hypotheses affect observation and experiment, or if the results of an experiment can be a judgment for the choice of competitive theories, Peter Galisou tried to go beyond the traditional two - dimensional interpretation model of ＂theory - experiment＂. He argued that the development of instruments and techniques are very critical for the results would be generally accepted, especiaUy when it can provide stableness and directness data. It is the common goal for experiments to eliminate the background interference and provide stableness and directness data through the improvement of instruments and techniques,

关 键 词：实验 仪器 旋磁效应 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]