检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学经济学院 [2]中国人民大学学术期刊社
出 处:《政治经济学评论》2018年第1期180-190,共11页China Review of Political Economy
摘 要:基于共同性的视角,哈特和奈格里主张公共资源已经成为资本主义所有经济部门的核心要素,私有财产是一种共同性失灵。他们通过考察公共资源的作用,强调以共同性作为斗争的焦点创造大同世界,并提出夺取公共资源的革命斗争模式。基于共享资源的视角,哈维认为对公共资源的圈占和私有化是资本主义发展的核心,他将公共资源视为一种社会关系,主张集体劳动创造公共资源,提出把公共资源用于社会利益的政治认知,并将其定位为一个反资本主义政治的框架。Based on the perspective of commonality, Hardt and Negri argued that the commons had become a central element of all the economic sectors of capitalism, and private property was a failure of the commonality, by examining the role of the corn- mons, they emphasized the commonality as the focus of struggle to create common wealth, and proposed the revolutionary struggle model to capture the commons. Based on the perspective of shared resources, Harvey argued that the occupying and privatiza tion of the commons were at the heart of capitalist development. He treated the corn- mons as a social relationship, advocated that collective labor created the commons, pro- posed a political awareness of sharing of the commons for social benefits and positioned it as an anti-capitalist politics frame.
分 类 号:F062.1[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28