检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Michael Tonry 郭大磊[2]
机构地区:[1]明尼苏达州立大学 [2]华东政法大学,上海200090
出 处:《国家检察官学院学报》2018年第1期150-170,共21页Journal of National Prosecutors College
摘 要:各国检察制度间的基础性差异表现在大陆法系与普通法系刑事司法体系的不同;表现在遵循"法定主义"原则与"便宜主义"原则刑事司法制度的不同;表现在对于政治因素是否可以合法地影响刑事司法的态度的不同。此外,各国检察机关在组织架构上及对检察官的培育及选任上也存在显著差异。各国检察制度的差异对不同国家检察机关的转向处置程序、指控、辩诉交易及量刑等检察实践产生了重要影响。对各国检察制度的比较研究可以对某一特定检察制度的优劣有更深刻地理解与把握,并认识到哪种检察制度能够更好地践行平等、公正与理性,以便政策制定者可以以跨国的视角审视并改善本国的检察制度。The foundational differences between the procuratorial systems are manifested in the Continental European civil-law and Anglo-Saxon common-law systems,in systems characterized by the "legality principle"and the "expediency principle,"and in the countries in which political influence on criminal justice system is or is not considered legitimate. And also the structural location and recruitment and career structure differs in different procuratorial systems. Those differences have important implications for how systems work in diversion,charging,bargaining,and sentencing. To have more and better knowledge of procuratorial systems in different countries can help to understand better the strengths and weaknesses of particular system. And can help to learn which kinds of systems better promote values of equality,justice,and rationality so that policy makers can look across national boundaries to find ways to improve their own national systems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222