检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏大学财经学院,江苏镇江212013 [2]江苏科技大学经济与管理学院,江苏镇江212002
出 处:《大庆师范学院学报》2018年第1期25-34,共10页Journal of Daqing Normal University
基 金:国家社科基金项目"中国上市银行公司治理有效性研究"(15BGL079)
摘 要:我国银行业一直深受各类风险的困扰。风险防范是内部控制的目标之一,国有商业银行内部控制较为薄弱,导致风险防范不力。国有商业银行内部控制之间缺乏借鉴和学习,是导致风险防范薄弱的一个重要原因。基于风险防范的目标,内部控制在各个银行之间的比较性研究可以揭示内部控制要素功能之间的差异,并揭示不同银行各类风险防范之间的差异。研究表明,内部控制五个要素在四大国有商业银行各类风险防范上各有优劣,不同银行之间应相互学习、相互借鉴,共同提高风险防范能力。China's banking industry has been plagued by all kinds of risks. Risk control is one of the objectives of internal control,yet internal control of state-owned commercial banks is relatively weak, resulting in poor risk control. Lack of learning of internal control from inner department in state-owned commercial banks is an important cause of that weak risk control. Based on the objective of risk control, the comparative study of the internal control between the banks can reveal differences between the ele-ments of the internal control function,and various risk control differences in different banks. This re-search shows that the five elements of inner control have their respective advantages in different risk a- voidance,and the four national commercial banks should study from each other to raise the risk avoid-ance ability altogether.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28