检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张翀达 张红梅 孟闫凯 叶枫 姜军 欧阳汉 赵心明 用纯武
机构地区:[1]国家癌症中心中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院影像诊断科,100021
出 处:《中华肿瘤杂志》2018年第1期46-51,共6页Chinese Journal of Oncology
基 金:卫生公益性行业科研专项(201402019);首都临床特色应用研究与成果推广课题(Z161100000516101);中国癌症基金会北京希望马拉松专项基金(LC2016A05)
摘 要:目的探讨T2加权成像(T2wI)、扩散加权成像(DWI)及T2WI+DWI在直肠癌分期中的诊断价值。方法收集2011年1月至2013年12月间经手术病理证实且术前未行任何抗肿瘤治疗的直肠癌患者120例,根据术前MRI资料分为T2WI、DWI和T2WI+DWI3组,分别对肿瘤T分期进行评价,并与病理结果进行比较,计算不同序列T分期的敏感度和特异度。应用T2WI+DWI序列对N分期进行评价,并与病理结果进行比较。结果T2WI、DWI和T2WI+DWI序列诊断直肠癌T分期的准确率分别为83.3%(100/120)、65.0%(78/120)和92.5%(111/120)。与T2WI和T2WI+DWI比较,DWI序列诊断直肠癌T1、T2期的特异度、T3期的敏感度均较低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。DWI序列诊断直肠癌T2期的敏感度(63.0%)低于T2WI+DWI序列(88.9%)。T2WI+DWI序列对诊断直肠癌T2期的敏感度(88.9%)和T3期的特异度(94.0%)高于T2WI序列(分别为51.9%和72.O%)。T2WI+DWI序列诊断直肠癌N分期的准确率为62.1%(72/116)。结论高分辨T2WI是直肠癌治疗前分期的关键序列,单独DWI序列尚不能进行准确分期,但T2WI联合DWI可以提高直肠癌T分期的准确率。T2WI+DWI评价直肠癌N分期尚需进一步研究。Objective To compare the diagnostic value of T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion- weighted imaging (DWI) , and T2WI+DWI magnetic resonance imang (MRI) for staging of rectal cancers for improving the accuracy of tumor staging. Methods From January 2011 to December 2013, 120 cases of rectal cancers proved by colonoscopy without receiving any anti-tumor treatment were enrolled retrospectively. The MRI data for these patients were divided into three groups, ie., T2WI, DWI and T2WI+DWI, for evaluating the tumor stages. The results were compared with histopathologic findings. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared with chi-square test. The nodal staging was predicted by using T2WI+DWI. Results The accuracy for prediction of tumor staging was 83.3%, 65.0% and 92.5% for T2WI, DWI, and T2WI+DWI respectively. The specificity for evaluating T1 and T2 stage, and the sensitivity for evaluating T3 by DWI was significantly lower than those using T2WI and T2WI+DWI in rectal cancers. The sensitivity for evaluation of T2 by DWI was lower than that using T2WI + DWI ( 63.0% vs. 88.9%). The sensitivity for evaluation T2 and specificity for T3 by T2WI+DWI was higher than thouse using T2WI only (88.9% vs. 51.9%, 94.0% vs. 72.0%). The accuracy for prediction of nodal staging by using T2WI+DWI was 62.1% (72/116). Conclusions T2WI is the key sequence for staging of rectal cancers. Although the diagnostic accuracy was not good by using DWI alone, the combination of T2WI and DWI can improve the accuracy significantly for tumor staging in rectal cancers, whereas the nodal staging was still a hard task for radiologists.
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R735.37[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249