检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学经济学院 [2]中国人民大学经济学院 [3]范德比尔特大学经济系 [4]对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院
出 处:《经济评论》2018年第1期47-61,共15页Economic Review
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目"中国经济自发展能力研究"(项目号:15ZDB133);国家社科基金青年项目"中国居民消费结构转变对经济波动的影响研究"(项目号:16CJL012)资助
摘 要:通过构建一个两部门动态一般均衡模型,本文主要研究消费结构升级、要素价格扭曲等因素对中国农业劳动力转移的影响。基于稳态的数值计算结果表明,上述因素对农业劳动力转移都有不同程度的正面影响。当所有因素同时改变0.1个单位时,消费结构升级对农业劳动力转移的影响程度最大,为4.63%,紧随其后的是部门间资本租金扭曲与部门技术进步,部门间工资扭曲的影响程度最弱,仅为0.84%。不仅如此,前三种因素对农业劳动力转移的影响都是非常显著的,这表明促成中国农业劳动力转移的主导原因是复合型的,这与美国经济城乡一体化进程中的情形有很大不同。This paper constructs a two-sector dynamic general equilibrium model to investigate the mechanism of how each of the following factors influence China' s rural- to- urban labor migration, i.e., household consumption upgrade, sectorial capital rent distortion, and wage distortion. We also explore the relative contribution of each factor in a unified framework. Our steady-state numerical results show that each of the above factors has a positive impact on labor migration to a different extent. When all four factors deviate by 0.1 unit from the initial steady state, household consumption upgrade exhibits the largest impact by promoting 4.63% more labor migration. The capital rent distortion and technology progress come closely with 2.68% and 2.34% more migration while wage distortion has the weakest effect with only 0.84% more. The top three factors all have significant impact on labor migration, suggesting that the dominant reason for China's rural-to-urban labor migration is essentially compound, which is significantly different from the United States case with just a single leading cause.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46