检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁恩泉[1]
机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区人民医院邕武医院口腔科,广西桂林530001
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2017年第33期66-68,共3页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的比较两种不同方法治疗下颌近中阻生智齿的效果。方法选取2013年2月—2016年8月我院收治的326例行下颌近中阻生智齿拔除术病患的资料,分为对照组A(传统拔牙术)和对照组B(高速涡轮机联合微创拔牙刀),每组163人,对比治疗效果。结果对照组B手术时间与并发症优于对照组A,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论高速涡轮机联合微创拔牙刀可有效缩短手术时间、降低患者并发症。Objective To compare the effect of two different methods in the treatment of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth. Methods From February 2013 to August 2016, 326 cases of impacted mandibular impacted wisdom teeth in our hospital were treated, divided into the control group A (traditional tooth extraction) and the control group B (high speed turbine combined with minimally invasive extraction knife), each group of 163 people, the efect of treatment was compared. Results The operation time and complication of B in the control group were better than that of the control group A, and the diference was statistically signifcant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion High speed turbine combined with minimally invasive tooth extraction can efectively shorten the operation time and reduce the patient's complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.237.242