行为控制、环境责任感与城市居民环境行为——基于2010CGSS数据的调查分析  

Behavioral control, environmental responsibility and environmental behavior of urban residents: An analysis based on 2010CGSS data

作　　者：彭远春[1] 毛佳宾 

机构地区：[1]中南大学公共管理学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第1期143-149,共7页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目"新型城镇化背景下的城乡关系研究"(15ZDA044);湖南省社科基金"公众环境意识影响环境行为的内在机制研究"(15YBA393);中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"城市居民绿色消费及其影响因素研究"(2017zzts255)

摘　　要：基于2010CGSS城市居民环境模块的数据,结合计划行为理论、价值-信念-规范理论与社会两难论,围绕行为控制、环境责任感对城市居民环境行为的影响展开探讨。研究表明:行为控制假设和环境行为意向假设得以验证,而环境责任感假设未获支持。具体而言,环境效能感越强、主体控制能力越强、环境行为意向越强烈的城市居民,实施越多的环境行为。环境效能感、主体控制能力在直接影响环境行为的同时,亦借助环境行为意向这一中介变量间接影响环境行为,但中介作用相对较小。Based on the urban residents’ environmental section data gathered by China General Social Survey in 2010, the study analyzes the impact of behavioral control and environmental responsibility on the environmental behavior of urban residents in combination with the theory of planned behavior, value-belief-norm and social dilemma. The research finds that the hypotheses of behavioral control and environmental behavior intention are valid, while environmental responsibility hypothesis is not supported. To be more specific, those urban residents with greater environmental efficiency, better subject control ability, and stronger environmental behavior intention, will implement more environmental behavior. In addition, environmental efficacy and subject control ability not only have a direct impact on environmental behavior, but also exert an indirect influence on environmental behavior via intermediate variable of environmental behavior intention, though a relatively small intermediate force.

关 键 词：环境行为 环境效能感 主体控制能力 环境责任感 环境行为意向 

分 类 号：C919[经济管理]