利益争议处理中调解组织和机制的十国比较  

International Comparison of Mediation Organizations and Mechanisms in Interest Dispute Resolution

作　　者：宋湛[1] 刘怡然 

机构地区：[1]首都经济贸易大学劳动经济学院,北京100070

出　　处：《中国劳动关系学院学报》2018年第1期28-35,共8页Journal of China University of Labor Relations

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目"集体劳动争议的预防与处理机制的系统化建构研究"(项目编号:14ZDA066)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：代替性纠纷解决方式(ADR)中的调解制度作为调整劳动关系、解决劳资矛盾的核心制度,其重要性日益凸显。而我国现行的利益争议调解机制尚未成熟,有待转型。目前此领域的研究多是针对外国国情,无法为我国转型提供思路。本文从国外的调解制度比较研究中借鉴比较方法,选取十个与我国有着相似经历的转型中国家和调解制度完善的发达国家,对比其调解组织和制度的特点。基于我国国情,为我国调解制度改革提出提升立法层次、完善成员设置和任命制度等政策建议。The mediation system of the Alternative Dispute Resolution is becoming more and more important as the core system to adjust the labor relations and solve the contradiction between labor and capital. However, the current mediation mechanism of interest disputes in China is not yet mature and needs to be transformed. At present, the research in this feld is mostly aimed at foreign national conditions, which can not provide ideas for China＇s transformation. Therefore, this paper draws on the comparative method from the comparative study of foreign mediation system, and then selects some developed countries with similar experiences in China and the developed countries with perfect mediation system, then to study their mediation characteristics. Finally, based on China＇s national conditions, sum up the experience of other countries for the reform of China＇s mediation system, such as raising the level of legislation, improving the membership setting and appointment of policy recommendations.

关 键 词：利益争议 调解组织 调解机制 国际比较 

分 类 号：F246[经济管理—劳动经济]