检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安电力中心医院急诊科,陕西西安710032
出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2018年第2期72-73,共2页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的探讨在急诊科快速建立气管插管方法组合。方法选取在急诊科需要紧急插管患者60例,分为S组和C组,各30例。S组采用UE-HC可视喉镜结合BURP手法实施气管插管,C组采用Macintosh喉镜结合BACK手法。比较两组的声门暴露成功率、平均插管时间、单次插管成功率、误插率、咽部不适反应率。结果 S组的声门暴露成功率、平均插管时间、气管插管的单次成功率、误插率、咽部不适发生率均优于C组(P<0.05)。结论 HC可视喉镜结合BURP手法能提高急诊科紧急气管插管的成功率和效率。Objective To explore the method combination of rapid establishment in emergency tracheal intubation.Methods Sixty cases of patients who needed emergency tracheal intubation were selected and divided into S group andCgroup, with 30 cases in each group. The S group used UE-HC visual laryngoscope and BURP skill to implement trachealintubation, and the C group with Macintosh laryngoscope and BACK skill. The success rate of glottal exposure, the averageintubation time, the success rate of single intubation, false positive rate, throat discomfort response rate in both groups werecompared. Results The success rate of glottis exposure, average intubation time, success rate of single intubation, falsepositive rate, throat discomfort response rate in the S group were better than those in the C group (P〈0.05). Conclusion HCvisual laryngoscope combined with BURP skill can improve the success rate and efficiency of emergency tracheal intubation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42