小口径引流导管行肋间插管术治疗原发性自发性气胸的临床研究  

Clinical study of small-bore drainage catheter intercostal catheterization in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax

作　　者：樊建勇 秦燕 杨玉东 王祥 邵杰 岳秀 许群涛 唐青 

机构地区：[1]兵器工业521医院,陕西西安710065

出　　处：《临床医学研究与实践》2018年第3期71-72,共2页Clinical Research and Practice

摘　　要：目的比较胸腔穿刺抽气与小口径引流导管行肋间插管术治疗原发性自发性气胸(PSP)的效果,以探索临床治疗PSP更为可靠的方法。方法回顾我院收治的PSP患者98例,分为试验组(n=51,小口径引流导管行肋间插管术)和对照组(n=47,胸腔穿刺抽气)。比较两组患者的疗效。结果两组患者3 d成功率及平均住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组1周复发率及不良反应发生率均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论小口径引流导管行肋间插管术治疗PSP效果与胸腔穿刺抽气法效果相当,但前者的不良反应发生率低、1周复发率少,可作为临床中治疗PSP的首选方法。Objective To compare the effects of thoracentesis and small-bore drainage catheter intercostal catheterization in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax（PSP） and explore a more reliable method for the treatment of PSP in clinic. Methods A total of 98 patients with PSP admitted in our hospital were retrospectively divided into experimental group（n=51, with small-bore drainage catheter intercostal cannulation） and control group（n=47, with thoracentesis）.The efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in 3-day success rate and average length of stay（P〉0.05）. The recurrence rate of 1 week and the incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The effects of small-bore drainage catheter intercostal catheterization and thoracentesis in the treatment of PSP are quite, however, the former has a lower incidence of adverse reactions and a smaller recurrence rate within 1 week, which can be used as the first choice for the treatment of PSP in clinic.

关 键 词：原发性自发性气胸 小口径引流导管行肋间插管术 穿刺抽气 

分 类 号：R655[医药卫生—外科学]