检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李绚丽
出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2018年第3期184-185,共2页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的分析小儿颌面部外伤清创缝合术的配合及护理效果。方法采用随机分组的方式将我院收治的颌面部外伤行清创缝合术的患儿100例随机分成对照组和观察组,每组50例。其中,对照组患儿采用常规护理,观察组在对照组的基础上采用护理干预措施,对两组患儿的手术配合率、护理满意度及术中生命体征进行对比分析。结果观察组患儿的手术配合率为90.0%,明显高于对照组的20.0%(P<0.05);护理满意度为96.0%,明显高于对照组的76.0%(P<0.05)。观察组在手术中的患儿的心率与呼吸频率低于对照组,血氧饱和度高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论针对小儿颌面部外伤患者在行清创缝合术的围术期中采用护理干预措施,能够有效地争取患儿的积极配合,提高护理满意度,保障患儿在术中生命体征平稳,值得在临床上推广应用。Objective To analyze the cooperation and nursing of maxillo-facial injury debridement surgery in children.Methods A total of 100 children with maxillo-facial injury debridement surgery admitted in our hospital were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group was given routine nursing,while on this basis, the observation group used nursing intervention measures. The operative cooperation rate, nursing satisfaction rate and intraoperative vital signs in the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The operative cooperation rate of the observation group was 90.0%, which was significantly higher than 20.0% of the control group(P〈0.05); the nursing satisfaction rate in the observation group was 96.0%, which was significantly higher than 76.0% in the control group(P〈0.05). The heart rate and respiratory rate in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the oxygen saturation in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion Nursing intervention measures used in children with maxillo-facial injury debridement surgery can actively effectively cooperate with the children, improve nursing satisfaction, guarantee the children's vital signs being stable, it is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249