投资者-东道国争端解决机制中用尽当地救济规则的“衰亡”与“复活”--兼评印度2015年BIT范本  

The Decline and Revival of the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism——A Review on India's 2015 Model BIT

作　　者：倪小璐[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院

出　　处：《国际经贸探索》2018年第1期85-97,共13页International Economics and Trade Research

摘　　要：印度2015年BIT范本纳入了用尽当地救济规则,标志着其在投资者-东道国争端解决机制方面的态度发生了重大转变,也暗含着用尽当地救济规则新的发展趋势。用尽当地救济规则曾经是国际投资领域中一项重要的争端解决规则。晚近以来,受投资自由化理论的影响,加之投资仲裁体制的盛行,用尽当地救济规则日趋"衰亡"。但随着投资仲裁制度正当性危机的日益加剧以及卡尔沃主义"复活"的影响,结合用尽当地救济规则自身的合理性,该规则似乎出现了"复活"的新动向。中国可以积极顺应这一趋势,重新考虑用尽当地救济规则在部分投资条约中的适用,以妥善解决投资争端,充分维护国家利益。India＇s 2015 Model BIT adopted the rule of exhaustion of local remedies. It represents a significant change in the attitude towards the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism, and implies the new developing trend of the rule of exhaustion of local remedies. The rule of exhaustion of local remedies used to be an important dispute settlement rule in the field of international investment law. In recent decades, influenced by the theory of investment liberalization, together with the prevalence of investment arbitration regime, the rule of exhaustion of local remedies has gradually declined. Nevertheless, with the aggravation of the legitimacy crisis of investment arbitration system and the revival of the Calvo Doctrine, combined with the rationality of the rule per se, the rule of exhaustion of local remedies seems to embrace a new trend of revival. China may actively conform to this trend, and reconsider the application of the rule in certain investment treaties, which aims at properly solving investment disputes while fully safeguarding the interests of the state.

关 键 词：BIT 用尽当地救济规则 争端解决机制 卡尔沃主义 

分 类 号：D996.4[政治法律—经济法学]