互联网新型不正当竞争案件诉前禁令制度的适用研究——以162份司法文书为视角  

Research on Applicable Conditions of Preliminary Injunction in the New Type of Unfair Competition Cases in Internet——Based on 162 Judgments of the Court

作　　者：吴太轩 王思思 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学经济法学院

出　　处：《竞争政策研究》2017年第4期74-81,共8页Competition Policy Research

基　　金：2015年国家社会科学基金项目"互联网新型不正当竞争行为法律规制的实证研究"(15BFX125)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：诉前禁令制度最开始被广泛应用于知识产权领域,其具有快速、有效遏止当事人侵权行为,避免损害后果扩大的特点。随着互联网行业蓬勃发展,逐渐出现了一些利用互联网技术实施不正当竞争的案例,在短时间内给受害方造成了难以弥补的损失。诉前禁令制度在互联网新型不正当竞争案件适用中法律依据的缺失以及由此借鉴知识产权领域中对诉前禁令的规定,给当事人的申请和法官的适用造成了一定的困惑。本文以所搜集的司法文书为视角,并借助SPSS统计分析软件,揭示当前诉前禁令制度在互联网新型不正当竞争案件中的适用困境;借鉴知识产权领域中诉前禁令制度框架,结合互联网及互联网企业自身特点,从实体和程序两个方面对互联网新型不正当竞争案件诉前禁令制度的完善进行分析论证。The preliminary injunction was initially used in the field of intellectual property. The advantage of this institution is to curb the infringement swiftly and effectively in avoiding the expand of damages. Along with the vigorous development of Internet , there have been some cases using Internet technology to implement the unfair competition behaviors, which caused irreparable damage to injured parties. Owning to the shortage of relevant law regulation, the judge have to turn to case decisions in intellectual property for reference, causing some confusion to both applicants and judge. This article aims to reveal the problems of preliminary injunction in law application according to the judgments of the court as well as using Statistical Product and Service Solutions. In the end, the author put the recommendations based on the framework of intellectual property law and traits of Internet from the perspective of procedure and substantiality.

关 键 词：诉前禁令 互联网不正当竞争 审查标准 审查程序 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]