检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王楠
机构地区:[1]武汉大学国际法研究所
出 处:《电子知识产权》2017年第12期65-74,共10页Electronics Intellectual Property
基 金:教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目"二十一世纪国际知识产权制度发展中的若干重大法律问题研究"(项目编号:07JJD820163)的资助
摘 要:"一带一路"倡议目前所涵盖的69个国家在参与国际知识产权争端解决的过程中遇到了一些困境。面对现有知识产权争端解决机制的缺陷和新的知识产权贸易发展趋势的挑战,"一带一路"沿线国家需要冲破牢笼,寻求具有"一带一路"特色的、符合"一带一路"沿线国家利益的知识产权争端解决机制。然而"一带一路"是否要构建、如何构建独有的知识产权争端解决机制,是"一带一路"沿线各国要面对的难题。本文在分析现有经验的基础上,结合国际趋势,对"一带一路"各国构建新型知识产权争端解决机制提出了设想。The 69 countries covered by"the Belt and Road"initiative are faced with some troubles when they deal with international intellectual property disputes with other countries. To overcome the drawback of existing intellectual property dispute settlement mechanism,and to meet the challenge of new trend in trade related intellectual property, the countries along "the Belt and Road" need to make a breakthrough and search for a dispute settlement mechanism which is characteristic and in favor of themselves. However, whether they should to build a unique intellectual property dispute settlement mechanism and how to build such a mechanism, is a problem the countries need to solve. This article analyzes the experience and the future trend, puts forward some suggestions to countries along "the Belt and Road" about how to design the new intellectual property dispute mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15