检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张坤[1]
机构地区:[1]黄河科技学院
出 处:《价格理论与实践》2017年第12期58-61,共4页Price:Theory & Practice
摘 要:以产业结构合理化与时间为门槛变量,采用门槛模型分析后发现,房价上涨在产业结构合理化水平较低时以及2011年以来对中国工业增长的挤出效应显著。较高的产业结构合理化水平有助于弱化房价上涨对产业结构效应的负向影响,因房价上涨体现了优势资源的空间集聚,若极化效应占主导则会加剧各地区工业发展的不平衡。为此,提出降低资本投入成本和税负成本,促进创新提高工业企业利润等政策建议。Taking the rationalization of industrial structure and time as the threshold variables, and using threshold model to make analysis, this paper finds that the rising housing price has made a significant Crowding-out effect on China's industrial growth at the low level rationalization of industrial structure as well as after 2011. The higher level rationalization of industrial structure will promote to weaken the negative impact of rising housing prices on the industrial structure effect, because the rising housing prices reflects the spatial agglomeration of the superior resources. If the polarization effect dominates, it will aggravate the imbalance of industrial development in all regions. Therefore, some suggestions are put forward such as reduction of the capital investment costs and tax burden,promotion of innovation and increase of industrial enterprises profits etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.15.150