邮政合同的立法思考  

Legislative Review on Postal Contract

作　　者：裴丽萍[1] 韩清怀[2] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学法学院 [2]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2002年第4期22-28,共7页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：邮政合同纠纷案件的处理出现分歧的原因 ,主要在于对邮政合同的含义、特征、功能等基本方面缺乏清晰认识以及完善的立法规定。因此 ,应加强邮政合同的研究和立法。根据世界各国邮政改革和发展的趋势以及我国的国情 ,应该将邮政合同仅限定为邮政通信合同 ,使其成为实现邮政通信普遍服务的法律工具。邮政通信合同在性质上是一种民事合同 ,应将其纳入未来民法典合同分则予以规定。在设计相关条款时 ,必须突出此种合同的法律特征 ,尤其要根据邮政通信企业的特殊性 ,对合同损失赔偿采用限额赔偿原则。The reason of disagreements in handling postal contract cases is mainly lacking of clarification and legislation in the meaning, character and function of postal contracts. Thus more research and legislative work about it is required. After studying the reform and development of postal services in the world and the specific situations in China, the author proposes that postal contract should be restricted as postal communications contract and implemented as a tool of supplying postal general services. Postal communications contract is in essence a kind of civil contracts, which should be included in the contract subsection of future civil code. This article suggests that special attentions should be paid to the principle of limited compensation liabilities of postal damages according to the particularities of postal services. A draft of postal contract is presented as a conclusion.

关 键 词：邮政普遍服务 邮政通信合同 函件 限额赔偿原则 

分 类 号：D922.296[政治法律—经济法学]