检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《金华职业技术学院学报》2018年第1期27-30,共4页Journal of Jinhua Polytechnic
摘 要:以乒乓球项目中正手攻球为测试技能,探讨不同反馈方式(KP、录像)对该技能学习绩效的影响。按照反馈方式(KP、录像、无)进行10轮攻球练习,10 min、24 h后进行无反馈条件下的攻球技能测试,记录不同反馈方式在正手攻球技能中的准确性、技评均值,收集了36名非体育专业的在校高职大学生攻球技能学习绩效的数据。结果:(1)KP、录像反馈组的学习效果优于配对组,KP、录像反馈方式是提高运动技术学习与掌握水平的有效方式。(2)KP和录像反馈方式能全面提升乒乓球正手攻球技能的学习绩效。(3)录像反馈组的学习效果优于KP反馈组,录像反馈方式的学习绩效优于KP反馈方式。This thesis takes table tennis forehand attack skills as test item with a purpose of discussing the influence of different ways of feedback on this skill acquisition. According to different ways of feedback including KP, video and no feedback, 36 students were divided into 3 groups, having 10 rounds of forehand practice. Then, they were given tests on this skills acquisition after 10 minutes and 24 hours respectively. Tests were taken under different ways of feedback to determine the accuracy and average performance. The results are as follows : ( 1 ) KP and video are better ways of feedback, compared with no feedback. KP and video ways of feedback are effective ways in improving students' skill acquisition. (2) KP and video feedback can improve students' forehand attack skills in a comprehensive way. (3) Students' learning effect with video feedback is better than KP feedback and they performed better in the tests as well.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.151