改编权的保护范围与侵权认定问题:一种二元解释方法的适用性阐释  

Protection Scope and Infringement Determination of Adaptation Right:One Application Interpretation in Dualistic-Systems Explanation Method

作　　者：李杨[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院 [2]江苏高校区域法治发展协同创新中心

出　　处：《比较法研究》2018年第1期63-75,共13页Journal of Comparative Law

基　　金：2016年国家社科基金项目"传媒发展融合中的转换性使用著作权问题研究"(16BFX169);2015年江苏省社科基金项目"基于中美实证比较的作品非字面侵权判定研究"(15FXC003)的研究成果

摘　　要：改编权是一项重要的著作财产权。在理解和界定改编权的保护范围时,有必要构建一种"行为—作品"范畴的二元解释方法。二者共同构成改编权保护范围的双重认知体系,同时也是侵权认定中彼此联系、互为印证的重要因素。从二元范畴来看,改编是具备一定独创性且保留作品基本内容的改动行为。在改编侵权认定的基本规则上,应重视"相似性"在改编来源事实和侵权价值判断中的双重内涵,区分"证据性相似"与"实质性相似"。在改编权的侵权认定方法与步骤方面,"来源事实认定—对接层分析—侵权价值判断"的新三步法是解决改编侵权认定问题的一种理论尝试,同时对司法实践也具有积极的指导意义。Adaptation right is an important economic right of copyright. In understanding and defining the protection scope of adaptation right,it is necessary to build one ＂ behavior-works ＂dualistic-systems explanation method. It not only constitutes the dual cognitive system for protection scope of adaptation right,but also is very important mutual recognition factor to the infringement determination.From the perspective of works,the requirements of adaptation behavior include the creative alteration and reservation of the basic expression of prior works. In the basic rules of infringement determination,we should pay more attention to the double meanings of similarity in the source-relations fact and infringement value judgment and the distinction between probative similarity and substantial similarity. In methods and steps to identify the infringement of adaptation right,the new three-step method of＂source identification of fact-interlayer analysis-infringement value judgment＂is one theoretical method and has positive guiding function to solve the problem of adaptation infringement.

关 键 词：改编权 行为 作品 综合性表达 相似性 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]