磁扣式约束带在精神科保护性约束中的应用效果分析  

The analysis of Application effect of the magnetic buckle restraint strap in the psychiatric patients for protective restraint

作　　者：熊玉芳 邓克琴 张仁刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川省自贡市精神卫生中心,自贡643020

出　　处：《当代护士（下旬刊）》2018年第2期147-150,共4页Modern Nurse

摘　　要：目的分析磁扣式约束带和传统布带式约束带对精神科保护性约束患者的效果观察,为精神科更新约束用具提供依据。方法将符合《国际疾病分类(第10版)》(ICD-10)诊断标准的80例需要保护性约束的精神疾病患者,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,观察组采用磁扣式约束带约束,对照组采用布带式约束带约束,每15-30 min观察一次。比较两组约束操作时间、患者被持续约束时间、约束有效性及护理人员对约束带的满意度。结果观察组约束操作时间、患者被持续约束时间均较对照组短(P<0.05);两种约束带的约束有效性、护理人员对两种约束带的满意度比较,磁扣式均优于布带式(P<0.05)。结论磁扣式约束带的保护性约束效果优于布带式约束带,可推广运用于临床。Objective To analyze the magnetic buckle restraint belt and traditional cloth type restraint effect on the application of protective constraint of psychiatric patients, provide the basis for the psychiatric restraint appliance update.Methods A total of 80 psychiatric inpatients met with the criteria of the ＂International Classification of diseases （Tenth Edition）＂（ICD-10） were randomly divided into observation group and control group.The magnetic button was given to the study group while the control group received traditional cotton restraint strap.All pa- tients were interviewed every 15 to 30 minutes during restraint.The two groups were compared in terms of constraint operation time,patient du- ration constraint duration, constraint effectiveness, and satisfaction of nursing staff to the limited girdle. Results The obseivation group patients were continuous operation time, constraint constraint time was shorter than the control group （P〈0.05） ;comparison of two kinds of va- lidity constraints, constraints on nursing staff with two kinds of constraints with satisfaction, magnetic buckle type are better than the tape type （P〈0.05） .Conclusion The magnetic button restraint straps are better than the protective belt type cloth belt.Can be widely used in clinical.

关 键 词：磁扣式 布袋式 约束带 约束效果 

分 类 号：R473.74[医药卫生—护理学]