民国濉河流域省际水事纠纷及其解决机制——以苏皖两省疏浚龙岱湖(河)、奎河纠纷为中心  

Interprovincial Water Dispute and Solution Mechanism in Sui River Basin in the Republic of China——exemplified by the disputes on Longdaihu river and kui river in Jiangsu and Anhui provinces

作　　者：王琦[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽理工大学楚淮文化研究中心,安徽淮南232001

出　　处：《安徽理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第6期1-7,共7页Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Social Science

基　　金：2016年度安徽高校人文社会科学研究重点项目"生态灾变与文化制衡:20世纪上半叶凤台花鼓灯复兴现象的生态人类学解读"(SK2016A0294)

摘　　要：民国时期濉河流域水文环境因受黄河夺淮等自然因素与人水争地等社会因素的影响而发生显著变化,致使苏皖两省围绕着疏浚龙岱湖(河)和奎河问题产生了长期纠纷。双方致力于通过构建区域行政协调机制来化解矛盾,并呈现出从"两省会勘——十县联席会议——导淮委员会主导的三方会勘——行政督察专员会商"的制度演进过程。洪灾风险转移诱发的利益失衡与制衡是制度演进的内驱力,水治理模式制约下不同主体的干预策略是演进的外部动力。In the Republic of China, the hydrological environment of the due to the social factors such as the Yellow River ’ s taking Huai River and other water - relasult , there existed long - term disputes on Daidaihu river and Kui River between Jiangsu and Anhui provinces.Both sides are committed to resolving conflicts through the establishment of a regional admmechanism which clearly presented the process ： “ Joint Investigation between Two Provinces -Joint Meeting a-mong Ten Counties-Under the Leadership of the Committee - Joint Investigation of Three parties-Joint Consul-tation of Administrative Inspectors”. The interest imbalance and check - and - balance caused by the transfer offlood risks are the driving forces of institutional evolution, while the intervention straunder the water governance model are the external forces of the evolution of the mechanism.

关 键 词：民国 濉河 省际水事纠纷 制度演进 

分 类 号：K252[历史地理—历史学]