检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学中国农村研究院,北京100062 [2]南开大学经济学院,天津300071
出 处:《农林经济管理学报》2018年第1期7-14,共8页Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management
摘 要:实现规模化是粮食加工业发展的重要目标。然而,当前稻米加工业呈现的"小企业微利、大企业亏损"现象却对规模化政策的合理性带来挑战。基于工业企业数据库中企业层面数据,考察稻米加工业企业规模对利润率的影响。结果表明:稻米加工业企业规模与利润率呈倒"U"型关系,且多数企业位于拐点左侧,该结果意味着扩大企业规模有助于企业利润率的提升,这与现实状况不符。为进一步解释理论结果与现实差异,结合比价扭曲的稻米市场环境,实证检验比价扭曲对企业规模与利润率关系的调节效应,分析认为比价扭曲是导致企业规模整体偏低状况下企业规模与利润率走势趋异的重要原因。Scalization is an important goal of industrial development while the current rice processing mar-ket has shown a phenomenon of “meager profits for small enterprises and loss for large enterprises”.This paperexamines the effect of firm size on productivity in rice processing industry,and explains the difference betweentheory and reality.The results show that the size and productivity of rice processing enterprises are of an invert-ed “U” type,but most enterprises are located on the left side of the inflection point,indicating that the expan-sion of enterprise scale will bring about the improvement of enterprise efficiency.Further analysis shows that theprice-distorting environment of “stronger paddy rice but weaker husked rice” can give some explanations forthe deviation.According to the conclusion of this paper,short-term adaptation and long-term reform of the ad-justment model can promote the scale of the process in food processing industry.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112