从汉唐春秋类书目的变化看春秋学的发展——以《汉书·艺文志》和《新唐书·艺文志》为例  

Development of Chunqiuxue from the Change of Chunqiu Bibliography from Han to Tang Dynasty——A Case Study of Hanshu-Yiwenzhi and Xintangshu-Yiwenzhi

作　　者：蒋桐阳 

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学历史文化学院

出　　处：《兰台世界》2018年第2期128-131,共4页Lantai World

摘　　要：春秋类书是春秋学赖以建立的基础。对比研究《汉书·艺文志》和《新唐书·艺文志》的春秋类书目,可知春秋三家的历史地位与其存书种数的多寡正好一致。西汉公羊地位最高,谷梁次之,左氏最低。东汉以后至唐,左氏类著作和从三传延伸出的著作持续增加,学者间的相互批评也不断,不仅说明春秋学的主体从公羊学转移到了左氏学,左氏的地位渐至最高,同时也说明春秋学在总体上保持了向上发展的态势。The series books of Chunqiu is the basis for the establishment of Chunqiuxue. By comparing the Chunqiu bibliography ofwith that of , we can see the historical status of the three schools of Chunqiu is exactlyconsistent with the number of their book types. In Western Han dynasty, the status of Gongyang was the highest, followed byGuliang and the lowest Zuoshi. After Eastern Han to Tang dynasty, Zuoshi＇s books and books extended from the Three Biographiescontinued to increase, and the criticism between scholars also increased. It showed the main body of Chunqiuxue transferred fromGongyang to Zuoshi. The gradual rise of Zuoshi indicated the general upward trend of Chunqiuxue.

关 键 词：春秋三传 春秋学 汉书·艺文志 新唐书·艺文志 

分 类 号：G257.35[文化科学—图书馆学]