不同气道湿化方法对人工气道脱机患者的影响  

Effect of different airway humidification methods on off-line of artificial airway

作　　者：翟怀香[1] 徐萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省连云港市第一人民医院新海院区重症监护室,江苏连云港222002

出　　处：《实用临床医药杂志》2018年第4期123-124,127,共3页Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice

摘　　要：目的探讨ICU人工气道患者脱机后不同气道湿化方法对湿化效果的影响。方法将80例ICU脱机后保留人工气道的患者随机分成2组,40例序号单数者为对照组,采用常规T管吸氧气道湿化方法,40例序号双数者为观察组,采用呼吸湿化治疗仪进行气道湿化,比较2种气道湿化方法对痰液黏稠度、下呼吸道感染发生率等的影响。结果观察组痰液黏稠度好于对照组(P<0.05);观察组呼吸道感染发生率低于对照组(P<0.05);护士对呼吸湿化治疗仪的满意度高于普通T管湿化方式(P<0.05)。结论采用呼吸湿化治疗仪对保留人工气道脱机患者进行气道湿化,效果优于普通T管吸氧气道湿化法。Objective To investigate the effect of different airway humidification methods on off-line of artificial airway. Methods A total of 80 ICU patients with off-line of artificial airway were randomly divided into two groups. A total of 40 odd numbered cases were as control group,given conventional T tube airway humidification. Another 40 even numbered cases were as observation group,given therapeutic equipment for airway humidification. The effects of two airway humidification methods on the viscosity of sputum and the incidence of lower respiratory tract infection were compared.Results The sputum viscosity of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group( P < 0. 05). The incidence of respiratory tract infection in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group( P < 0. 05). The nursing satisfaction was much higher than that of the ordinary T tube( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Airway humidification with therapeutic equipment has better effect on airway humidification than that of ordinary T tube.

关 键 词：气道湿化 人工气道 脱机 

分 类 号：R472.9[医药卫生—护理学]