检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁阳阳
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2018年第1期49-53,共5页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
摘 要:随着民主危机的屡屡爆发,越来越多的学者开始挑战"选举民主"的话语霸权。具体而言,出现了三个层面的努力:一是微观层面,只是局限于民主的形式扩充或支撑;二是中观层面,冲破从形式来界定民主的既有范式,强调民主概念的实质性;三是宏观层面,着眼于全球文明的冲突或融合,从东方文明中探求民主的其它可能。在此基础上,也有许多学者将上述思考融合起来,提出综合性的民主概念。这为重新理解民主提供了新的思路。在我国推进民主,有必要从"选举民主"的藩篱中解放出来,建构出真正适合的中国式民主话语。With the outbreak of the democratic crisis, an increasing number of scholars begin to challenge the hegemony of " electoral democracy" . Specifically, there are three different ways. The first is from the micro perspective paying attention to the expansionor support of the democratic forms which is still inside the range of formalism. The second is from the meso perspective emphasizing thesubstantial purposes of democracy which has get rid of the formalism paradigm. The third is from the macro perspective focusing on theconflict or integration of global civilization and exploring other possibilities of democracy from the Oriental civilization. Besides, manyscholars also have put forward a comprehensive concept based on the efforts above. It provides new ideas for re-understanding democracy. To promote democracy in China, it is necessary to liberate from " electoral democracy" and construct " Chinese Democracy" .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30