检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:欧阳晓莉[1,2]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学历史学系 [2]邮编:200433
出 处:《史学理论研究》2018年第1期67-75,共9页Historiography Bimonthly
基 金:国家社科基金项目"公元前三千纪晚期两河流域中央与地方关系研究"(项目编号:17BSS020)的阶段性成果
摘 要:卡尔·波兰尼首次提出的经济体制"嵌入"社会制度的理论影响深远,但他关于古代经济的论述在国内学术界尚未引起关注。本文聚焦于波兰尼从其"嵌入"理论发展而出的互惠、再分配和市场三种经济模式学说,揭示他认为两河流域不存在市场这一结论背后的史实依据和论证过程,并评述他的三种模式和以上结论在两河流域经济史研究中所激起的学术争议与交锋。波兰尼学说对于这一领域的贡献并不在于其具体结论,而在于能够鼓励习惯于实证研究的学者对本领域的研究范式进行探讨和反思,进而寻求从宏观视野把握两河流域经济发展的特点。Karl Polanyi is well-known for his theory of embeddedness,but his publications on ancient economies remain little noticed in Chinese academia. This article provides an introduction to his three modes of economic integration,which are reciprocity,redistribution,and market,that he developed in studying economic history. It then presents his study of ancient Mesopotamian economy and discusses his observation that there had not existed marketplace in Mesopotamia. The author examines Polanyi's evidence,analyzes his argument, and reviews the controversy caused by his observation among scholars of ancient Mesopotamia. She concludes that although his specific conclusions may not hold water any longer,Polanyi has contributed to the study of Mesopotamian economy by inspiring later scholars to approach the field from a more theoretical and comprehensive perspective,resulting in the progress that transcends empirical data collection and rudimentary interpretation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.151