检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:万丹[1,2] 梁博[1,2] 聂晓刚 喻武[1,2] 张博[1,2] WAN Dan;LIANG Bo;NIE Xiaogang;YU Wu;ZHANG Bo(Department of Resources and Environment, XiZang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry College, Linzhi 860000, China;Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation in Alpine-cold Region, XiZang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry College)
机构地区:[1]西藏农牧学院资源与环境学院,林芝860000 [2]西藏农牧学院高寒水土保持研究中心,林芝860000
出 处:《生态学报》2018年第3期1065-1074,共10页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金(41461063;41661061);西藏自治区科技厅自然基金项目(2016ZR-NY-04)
摘 要:以色季拉山为代表的藏东南高原山地的水土流失已成为区域生态环境的重要问题。对色季拉山不同海拔梯度土壤物理性质进行分析,结果表明:(1)除海拔3600、4200m外,土壤容重随土层深度增加而增大;总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度随土层深度增加而减小;非毛管孔隙度随土层变化无明显规律;饱和含水率、毛管含水率、田间持水率均随土层深度增加而减小。(2)不同海拔梯度,土壤容重总均值、总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度和非毛管孔隙度变化范围分别为:0.58—1.10g/cm^3、57.00%—72.47%、53.33%—67.59%和3.20%—4.87%。饱和含水率、毛管含水率、渗透性具有相同规律,均为3800、3400m处最大,3200m和3600m处最小,4000—4600m居中,田间持水率随海拔梯度变化呈M型波动性趋势。(3)土壤物理性质具有较强的空间异质性,各指标间有明显的空间自相关现象。土壤物理性质各指标在不同土层和海拔间有较明显的差异性,人为干扰也是导致土壤物理性质空间异质性的重要原因。(4)总体上,色季拉山表层土壤(0—10cm)物理结构优于深层次(>10—30cm)土壤;3200m和3600m处最差,4000—4600m居中,3400—3800m最佳。研究结果提示,以色季拉山为代表的藏东南原始森林地带,土壤结构脆弱,为保持水土,应防止旅游和森林生产经营的过度开发。Soil and water loss in the southeastern plateau of Tibet, particularly in Sygera Mountain has become an important problem in regional ecological environment. The soil physical properties of Sygera Mountain at different altitude gradients were analyzed. The results showed that:(1) soil bulk density increased with the increase in soil depth at different elevations, except for 3600m and 4200m. The total porosity and capillary porosity decreased with soil depth at different elevations. The non-capillary porosity was not significantly related to the soil layer. The saturated soil water content, capillary water content, and field capacity decreased with the increase in soil depth at different elevations. (2) The soil bulk density, total porosity, capillary porosity, and non-capillary porosity at different elevations ranged from 0.58-1.10g/cm3, 57.00%-72.47%, 53.33%-67.59%, and 3.20%-4.87%,respectively. The saturated water content, capillary water content, and permeability followed a similar trend, with the maximum values at an elevation of 3800m and 3400m, minimum values at 3200m and 3600m, and intermediate values in the summit area (4000-4600m). Field capacity plotted against altitude revealed an M-shaped trend. (3) The soil physical properties at different elevation had a strong spatial heterogeneity, and the indices revealed spatial auto-correlation with each other. Significant differences in soil physical properties were present among different soil layers and elevations. Moreover, human disturbance was an important reason underlying the spatial heterogeneity of soil physical properties. (4) In general, physical properties of surface soil (0-10 cm) at Sygera Mountain were better than that of deeper soil layers (10-30cm or more). However, physical properties of surface soil at the foot of the mountain (3200m) and 3600m were the worst, whereas those in the summit area (4000-4600m) were intermediate, and those in the hillside areas (3400,3800m) were the best. The present study
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15