贪污受贿案件刑事量刑的实证研究  

An Empirical Study of Criminal Sentencing in Corruption Cases

作　　者：过勇[2] 李松锋[1,3] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学公共管理学院 [2]清华大学公共管理学院廉政与治理研究中心 [3]中国政法大学法学院

出　　处：《经济社会体制比较》2018年第1期77-89,共13页Comparative Economic & Social Systems

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目:“十八大以来党内监督理论和实践创新研究”(项目编号:17AKS014);清华大学自主科研项目:“党内监督创新与中国特色廉政治理模式研究”(项目编号:2016THZWYY08)

摘　　要：惩治是中国反腐败战略的重要组成部分。改革开放以来,中国加大了惩治腐败的力度,先后查处各类腐败案件逾百万起。然而,腐败案件刑事量刑的尺度问题日益引起社会关注。文章基于对2796起腐败案件刑事判决的实证研究,分析了法定量刑因素以及部分法外因素对量刑结果的影响。研究发现,判决年份和判决地点对贪污受贿案件刑事量刑的影响不大;涉案金额和行政级别确实在很大程度上决定了腐败案件的量刑结果,而且存在“一千万拐点”和“正厅级拐点”的现象;诸如自首、退赃、立功等其他因素对贪污受贿案件刑事量刑的影响有限。Punishment is a crucial part of anti - corruption strategies in China. Since reform and opening up, the Chinese govern- ment has been strengthening punishment of corruption. Over one million corruption cases of various types have been investigated so far. However, criminal sentencing in corruption cases has attracted increasing attention in China recently. This paper, based on an empirical study on criminal sentencing in 2,796 corruption cases, analyzes the impact that legal and certain extra - legal factors may have on sentencing results. Our research finds out that the years when, and the venues where, the sentences were made have little impact on sentencing results. The amount of money involved and the administrative rank of officials affect senten- cing results to a large extent, and there emerge a ＂10 Million Yuan Turning Point＂ and a ＂Bureau Level Turning Point＂. Other factors, such as surrendering oneself, returning illicit gains and performing meritorious service, have limited impact.

关 键 词：腐败 腐败案件 刑事量刑 贪污 受贿 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]