检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江工业大学建筑工程学院,浙江杭州310023 [2]中国美术学院风景建筑设计研究院,浙江杭州310014
出 处:《城市发展研究》2018年第1期110-118,共9页Urban Development Studies
基 金:浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(17NDJC230YB)
摘 要:在特色小(城)镇建设大热的当下,把隐藏于后台的社会维度价值拉回前台,引出研究问题:特色小镇在产业经济方面所取得的显著成就,是否会以其在社会维度发展的失衡为代价?以杭州市玉皇山南基金小镇和余杭梦想小镇两个特色小镇为例,采用环境行为学调查方法,对小镇建设区域与周边社区的社会融合状况进行了考察。分析发现,两个小镇均存在一定程度的物质空间、社会阶层以及社会交往的隔离。对这些现象进行了成因剖析,提出健全的特色小城镇建设需要从顶层设计一直贯彻到基层工作的政策体系,呼吁应在特色小城镇评估体系中强化社会维度指标,并提出相关建议。Under the background of characteristic town development booming,this paper pulls the hidden social dimension values to the foreground,and raises a research question: is it possible that the remarkable achievements of the characteristic towns in economical dimension might gain at the expense of the undermined social values? This paper studies the social inclusion statues of two cases in Hangzhou by Environment and Behaviour Study Survey methods,which are Fund Town in Yu-huang Hill and Dream Town in Yu-hang.It is found that the two towns have a certain degree of isolation in physical spaces,social stratum and social communication. This paper gives an analysis of the causes and mechanism of the problems,and proposes that a healthy characteristic town construction needs systematic and consistent policies from top to bottom. It claims that there is a need to strengthen the social dimension indicators in the characteristic town appraisal index system,and also proposes relevant suggestions.
分 类 号:TU984.2[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222