检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹文 郑亚军[2] CAO Wen;ZHENG Yajun(Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Fozuling Community Health Service Center, Wuhan Hubei 430205, China;Obstetrics Department, Hubei Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jingzhou Hubei 434499, China)
机构地区:[1]武汉市东湖开发区佛祖岭社区卫生服务中心妇产科,湖北武汉430205 [2]湖北省妇幼保健院产科,湖北荆州434499
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2018年第4期44-45,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探讨综合运用分娩镇痛方法的临床应用效果。方法随机选取2014年2月—2017年3月的80例产妇进行分组,实验组(40例)产妇采用精神预防性镇痛联合椎管内阻滞镇痛法,对照组(40例)产妇仅采用椎管内阻滞镇痛法,对比两组产妇的镇痛效果。结果实验组患者的镇痛优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在不同分娩镇痛法中,综合运用精神预防性镇痛联合椎管内阻滞镇痛法,更优于仅使用椎管内阻镇痛法,能够有效减轻产妇的疼痛。Objective To explore the clinical effect of the comprehensive use of labor analgesia. Methods 80 cases of parturients from February 2014 to March 2017 were randomly selected and divided into groups, the experimental group (40 cases) was treated paraesthesia analgesia combined with intraspinal block analgesia, the control group (40 cases) was only treated by intraspinal block analgesia, and the analgesic effect of two groups was compared. Results The analgesic effect of the patients in the experimental group was better than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically signifcant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion In different labor analgesia methods, comprehensive application of mental preventive analgesia combined with spinal canal internal obstruction and analgesia is better than using only spinal canal internal resistance analgesia, which can effectively reduce maternal pain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117