检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴迪[1]
机构地区:[1]云南省林业调查规划院营林分院,云南昆明650021
出 处:《林业调查规划》2017年第6期29-32,共4页Forest Inventory and Planning
摘 要:对当前云南省森林火灾损失面积主要采取的样带调查法、线路调查法、全林调查法、标准地调查法等调查方法进行分析比较,探讨各种调查方法利弊,结果表明:样带调查法面积求算准确,方法简便,可操作性强;线路调查法工作量小但受人为因素干扰大;全林调查法精度高但工作量大;标准地调查法对调查人员素质要求高。建议采用样带调查法调查森林火灾损失面积。Some investigative methods for forest fire damage area in Yunnan were analyzed, including the belt transect survey, route survey, whole forest survey, and sample survey. According to discussing advantages and disadvantages of the investigative methods, the results showed that the belt transect survey calculated accurately and operated easily; the route survey was light workload but interfered by human factors; the whole forest survey was high accuracy but heavy workload; the sample survey was strict with the quality of investigators. Based on the results, this paper suggested to use the belt transect survey method to investigate forest fire damage area.
关 键 词:森林火灾 过火面积 损失面积 样带调查法 云南省
分 类 号:S762.1[农业科学—森林保护学] F840.66[农业科学—林学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145