疼痛管理障碍问卷台湾地区版在我国大陆地区癌症患者中应用的信效度评价  

Evaluation for the reliability and validity of application of the Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form for cancer patients of China's Mainland

作　　者：娄方丽 田辉[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京社会管理职业学院护理专业教研部,101601 [2]北京劳动保障职业学院劳动经济管理系,100029

出　　处：《中国实用护理杂志》2018年第7期544-548,共5页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing

摘　　要：目的评价疼痛管理障碍问卷台湾地区版（BQT）在大陆地区癌症患者中应用的信效度。方法选择2015年1—3月在北京市7家医院的363例住院癌症患者进行BQT调查，用Cronbach系数和分半信度检验问卷的信度，用探索性因子分析、内容效度指数分析其效度。结果总问卷Cronbachα系数为0．799；经Spearman—Brown公式校正后得到的Equal Length系数为0．770，Guttman分半系数为0．770；11个因子累积贡献率为63．910％；内容效度指数为O．733，均在测量学可接受范围。结论BQT具有较好的信效度，可作为大陆地区癌症患者疼痛管理态度的测量工具。Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form （BQT） for cancer patients of China's Mainland. Methods A cross-sectional study was made among 363 hospitalized cancer patients from 7 hospitals in Beijing in January to March in 2015 with BQT. Methods of Cronbach alpha , split-half reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and content validity index were used to analyze its reliability and validity. Results All the indexes were in the measurement of acceptable range that the Cronbach alpha of BQT was 0.799, the Equal Length coefficient of Spearman-Brown was 0.770, the coefficient of Guttman Split-Half was 0.770, accumulating contribution rate of 11 factors was 63.910%, and the coefficient of content validity index was 0.733. Conclusions The reliability and validity of BQT are good and can be used to evaluate the pain management attitudes for cancer patients of China's Mainland.

关 键 词：癌症患者 疼痛管理障碍问卷 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R473.73[医药卫生—护理学]