儿童版父母教养方式问卷的修订  

Revision of“Egna Minnen Betr?ffende Uppfostran”Questionnaire for Children

作　　者：王美芳[1] 牛骅 赵晓[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学心理学院,济南250014

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2018年第1期6-11,共6页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目资助(31571133)

摘　　要：目的:修订适合中国文化背景下使用的儿童版父母教养方式问卷(Egna Minnen Betr?ffende Uppfostran for Children,简称EMBU-C)。方法:使用EMBU-C对1461名小学生进行问卷调查。结果:探索性因素分析发现,中文版EMBU-C包括情感温暖、焦虑性教养、拒绝和过度保护四个维度;验证性因素分析表明四因素模型拟合良好。父母拒绝、焦虑性教养以及过度保护维度与儿童焦虑量表各分量表得分和焦虑总分均呈显著正相关;父母情感温暖得分与儿童焦虑量表各维度得分不具有相关性或具有低相关。EMBU-C的四个维度Cronbach’sα系数在0.51-0.86之间,分半信度在0.57-0.89之间,重测信度在0.62-0.76之间。结论:经本研究修订后的中文版EMBU-C具有良好的信效度,为我国研究者今后开展父母教养方式的相关研究提供了更为简便、适用的测量工具。Objective： This study aimed to revise a Chinese version of the ＂Egna Minnen Betraffende Uppfostran＂ for children（EMBU-C）. Methods： The Chinese version of EMBU-C was administered to 1461 elementary school students. Re- sults： Exploratory factor analysis revealed four distinct factors： emotional warmth, anxious rearing, rejection, and overpro- tection; confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the four-factor model. Parents ＇ rejection, anxious rearing, and overprotec- tion had significantly positive correlations with children＇ s anxiety symptoms, while parents＇ emotional warmth had no sig- nificant correlation or had only a slightly positive correlation with children＇ s anxiety symptoms. The Cronbach＇ sct of four dimensions were ranged from 0.51 to 0.86, the split-half reliabilities were ranged from 0.57 to 0.89, and the retest reliabili- ties were ranged from 0.62 to 0.76. Conclusion： The Chinese version of EMBU-C is a reliable and valid instrument for as- sessing parenting style in Chinese parents.

关 键 词：EMBU-C 儿童 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]