检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《临床合理用药杂志》2018年第5期9-10,21,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
摘 要:目的比较不同剂量非布司他与别嘌醇治疗痛风的有效性和安全性。方法计算机检索Pub Med、Cochrane Library、Em Base、中国知网、万方和维普数据库,收集不同剂量非布司他与别嘌醇治疗痛风的随机对照试验(RCT),提取相关数据,采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入9项RCTs。Meta分析结果显示,随访最后3个月血清尿酸(s UA)持续低于6.0 mg/dl的患者比例、末次随访s UA低于6.0 mg/dl的患者比例非布司他(80、120 mg/d)组均高于别嘌醇组(P<0.05);治疗相关不良事件发生率非布司他(80、120 mg/d)组均低于别嘌醇组(P<0.05)。结论基于当前临床证据,非布司他(80、120 mg/d)相对于别嘌醇治疗痛风能有效降低s UA,减少治疗相关不良事件的发生。Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different dosages of febuxostat and allopurinol in treat- ment of gout. Methods Retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane library, EmBase, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP database by computer, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about different dosages of febuxostat versus allopurinol in treatment of gout were collected; and relevant date were extracted. Meta-analysis was drawn by RevMan 5.3 statistical software. Results A total of 9 RCTs were included. It was shown that the proportion of patients who achieved serum urate (sUA) 〈 6.0 mg/dl with last three monthly measur ements and the proportion of patients who achieved sUA 〈 6.0 mg/dl at the final visit in the group of using febuxostat ( 80 mg/d and 120 mg/d) are significantly higher than those in the group of using allopurinol( P 〈 0.05 ). For the risk of treat- ment-related adverse events, the group of using febuxostat(80 mg/d and 120 mg/d) are significantly lower than the group of using allopurinol(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion According to the evidence currently, febuxostat(80 mg/d and 120 mg/d) can reduce sUA and treatment-related adverse events compare with allopurinol.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229