视频分享网站著作权间接侵权的过错认定  

Video Sharing Sites' Fault Identification in Indirect Copyright Infringement

作　　者：马一德[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,武汉430073

出　　处：《现代法学》2018年第1期54-65,共12页Modern Law Science

基　　金：中央马克思主义理论研究和建设工程重大项目兼国家社科基金重大项目"知识产权保护与创新发展研究"(2016MZD022)

摘　　要：在兼顾技术的自然属性和社会属性的"技术价值论"视野下,视频分享网站在著作权间接侵权中的过错可分为"故意"和"过失"两种形态。而作为过失认定的客观标准,注意义务在性质上系安全保障义务在网络空间的自然延伸,以侵权结果预见义务为视频分享网站注意义务的主要内容,并强调依据不同行为对象设置不同程度的注意义务。对于过错责任形式,由于视频分享网站在承担补充责任后面临追偿成本过高的困境,形式上的连带责任异化为加重的自己责任,而根据视频分享网站的过错和与损害结果之间的原因力,按份责任能够避免视频分享网站承担过重责任,在公平原则的基础上合理分配损害赔偿不能的风险。Under the guidance of ＂technical value theory＂ taking both the natural attributes and social at- tributes of technology into consideration, the fault in indirect infringement of copyright by the video sharing websites include two forms of ＂intentional＂ and ＂negligence＂. As an objective criterion of negligence, the duty of care is the natural extension of security obligation in cyberspace, the foreseeable obligation of infringement results is the main content of duty of care for the video sharing website, and emphasizing that the degree of at- tention obligation is different from different behavior objects. For the liability form of fault, the video sharing website faces the difficulties of too much cost in debt recovery after taking the supplementary liability, the joint liability in form is alienated into aggravating its own responsibility. According to the causal link between the fault of the video sharing website and infringement result, the several liability could avoid overburden of the video sharing websites, and it should distribute the risks of not getting enough compensation based on the principle of fairness.

关 键 词：视频分享网站 应知 技术价值论 注意义务 按份责任 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]