关于社会主义革命“同时胜利”论与“一国胜利”论问题的旧议与新评  

Previous Controversy and New Comment on the Socialist Revolution of “Simultaneous Success”and “One Country's Triumph”

作　　者：高放[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学,北京100872

出　　处：《学习与探索》2018年第2期1-11,共11页Study & Exploration

摘　　要：国内学界关于社会主义革命"同时胜利"论与"一国胜利"论的学术争论由来已久,虽然多数学者对于这一问题已经取得了很大程度的观点共识,但仍有部分学者在这一问题上持有不同的意见,使得这一问题仍有巨大的学术探讨空间。近年来,杨贵颖、李心华的新著《"同时胜利"论与"一国胜利"论比较研究》对这一问题进行了更深入的论述,阐发了一系列新观点,并与俞良早的观点形成了鲜明的理论分歧,集中体现在社会主义革命是否划分为政治革命与社会革命两个阶段,十月革命是社会主义革命还是社会主义革命的"准备阶段","一国建设"论与"一国建成"论的根本区别是什么等一系列重大理论问题上。因此,重新梳理这一问题的相关研究成果,并进行细致的比较研究具有重要的理论意义和学术价值。Academic debates from Chinese scholars between the theory of "simultaneous success"and the theory of "one country's triumph"about the socialist revolution have a long history. On the problem,most scholars have reached a consensus to a large degree,but some scholars still hold different opinions,which cause great discussion space. In recent years,the new book A Comparative Study between "Simultaneous Success"and "One Country's Triumph"by Yang Guiying and Li Xinhua thoroughly expounds the problem and clarifies a series of new viewpoints sharply different from YU Liangzao's in theory,which are particularly illustrated in a series of significant theories on whether the socialist revolution is divided into two stages of political revolution and social revolution,on whether the October Revolution is classified into the socialist revolution or the preparation stage of that,on what fundamental differences are between the theory of one country's being constructed and the theory of one country's having been constructed. Therefore,it is of great theoretical significance and academic value to rearrange the relevant research results of the problem and carry out detailed comparative studies.

关 键 词：社会主义革命 马克思 恩格斯 列宁 斯大林 十月革命 “同时胜利”论 “一国胜利”论 

分 类 号：D15[政治法律—政治学]