TURP联合碎石钳与肾镜下Cyberwand双导管碎石治疗BPH合并膀胱结石效果比较  

Comparison of lithotrite lithotripsy and cyberwand dual probe ultrasonic intracorporeal lithotriptor for bladder stones in patients with BPH

作　　者：闻玉钢 邢维思 李金永[1] 满涛[1] 王志强[1] 

机构地区：[1]宁夏银川市第一人民医院泌尿外科,宁夏银川750001

出　　处：《宁夏医学杂志》2018年第1期32-33,共2页Ningxia Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的探讨BPH合并膀胱结石的治疗方法。方法选择BPH合并膀胱结石患者54例,采用TURP联合碎石钳(28例)和TURP联合肾镜下Cyberwand双导管碎石(26例)治疗,比较2组术中、术后情况。结果 TURP联合碎石钳组(碎石钳组)和TURP联合肾镜下Cyberwand双导管碎石组(Cyberwand组)在手术时间、膀胱冲洗时间、术后留置尿管时间、并发症发生等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但碎石钳组膀胱黏膜损伤发生率略高。结论与碎石钳组相比,Cyberwand组具有创伤小、手术操作方便、并发症少的优势。Objective To investigate the treatment of BPH with bladder stones. Methods 54 patients with BPH and bladder stones were selected, and patients were divided into two groups： TURP combined lithotrite （n =28） and TURP combined renal microscopically Cyberwand lithotripsy group （n = 26）, and the conditions of intraoperative and postoperative were compared. Results There were no significant differences in operation time, bladder washing time, catheter indwelling time and complications （P 〉 0.05 ）. The bladder mucosa injury in TURP combined lithotrite group were slightly higher. Conclusion Cyberwand lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment modality for bladder stones with BPH.

关 键 词：膀胱结石 前列腺增生 碎石 Cyberwand双导管 

分 类 号：R694.4[医药卫生—泌尿科学]