美国CAFC的Rule 36判决浅析与启示  

Brief Analysis and Inspiration of the Judgments of US Federal Circuit Rule 36

作　　者：龚红兵 

机构地区：[1]东莞理工学院法律与社会工作学院(知识产权学院)

出　　处：《中国发明与专利》2018年第1期25-30,共6页China Invention & Patent

基　　金：广东省教育科学"十一五"规划研究项目:<高等学校法学专业<知识产权法>课程双语教学的理论与实践研究>(项目编号2010tjk023);广东省级教研教改项目:<应用型本科院校<知识产权法>课程案例化;网络化和双语化教学平台建设的研究与实践>;2016年知识产权工作专项(省知识产权局软科学项目)<当前国际知识产权的新发展对广东省民营企业实施"走出去"战略的影响研究>

摘　　要：简要介绍了美国普通法系下法院体系特点及法院判决约束力规则、联邦巡回上诉法院(CAFC)的成立历史和管辖特性;对CAFC独有的Rule 36判决规则进行了详细介绍,包括Rule 36判决作出时机、Rule 36判决的法律效力、如何在诉讼实务中争取或避免拿到Rule 36判决,并就CAFC的Rule 36判决规则对于我国法院审判实践的启示进行了探讨。This paper briefly introduces some important characteristics of the common law system in US, such as the court system, the rule of precedential judgment, the history of CAFC and its jurisdiction. And then, the author focuses his attention on Federal Circuit Rule 36 （Fed.Cir.R.36）, such as when the judges of CAFC deliver the judgment of Fed.Cir.R.36, and what the legal effect of the judgment of Fed. Cir. R.36, and in litigation practice, how the lawyers try to or try not to obtain the judgment of Fed.Cir.R.36. Finally, in the Chinese judicial circumstance, with reference of rule of the judgment of Fed.Cir.R.36, the author provides some inspiration on reform of Chinese judicial trial procedure.

关 键 词：联邦巡回上诉法院 CAFC RULE 36判决 启示 

分 类 号：D971.2[政治法律—法学] DD913