分级诊疗相关研究论文发表情况的现状分析  

Current situation analysis of publications on hierarchical diagnosis in China

作　　者：李道丕 陈茂山[2] 唐雪峰 赵玮琳 朱小凤[2] 

机构地区：[1]遂宁市卫生和计划生育委员会,629000 [2]遂宁市中心医院 [3]四川省疾病与预防控制中心

出　　处：《中华医学科研管理杂志》2018年第1期49-53,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management

摘　　要：目的了解分级诊疗制度实施以来该项制度在全国的运行情况及研究动态，为下一步开展分级诊疗的相关研究提供参考方向。方法计算机检索CBMdisc、CNKI、万方数据库、VIP，检索时间从建库至2016年9月30日。对纳入文献来源期刊、发表时间、第一作者、发文地区、关键词等进行现状分析。结果最终纳入文献243篇，发文量逐年上升。发表在91种期刊，其中43．2％发表在核心期刊。第一作者共221人，来自149个单位，覆盖全国26个省市，核心作者仅18人，研究活跃区域主要在北京、湖北、四川、上海。研究热点主要是双向转诊、医疗服务利用及医疗保险。结论分级诊疗论文质量水平偏低，研究群体分散，研究力量较薄弱，研究深度及广度有待进一步加强，促进研究结果向指导实际工作的方向转化。Objective To explore the overall situation and development trend of the hierarchical diagnosis, to provide reference for further research direction. Methods Following databases, such as CBM,CNKI,Wanfang Database and VIP, were used to search for publications on this topic from the establishment of database to September 30th,2016. Bibliometric method was used to analyze these lit- eratures, for instance periodical distribution, years, authors and regions; key words were taken into consideration. Results 243 literatures in total were included, the a number of publication is keep in- creasing every year. These papers were published in 91 kinds of journals, 43.2~/oo of which were statis- tical source journals. There were 221 first authors ~Crom 149 institutions distributed in 26 provinces and municipalities. There were only 18 core authors. The active regions of research were Beijing, Hubei, Sichuan and Shanghai. The research content mainly focused on two-way referral, utilization of medical service and medical insurance. Conclusions The quality of papers is low, research authors are widely distributed, the research strength is not strong enough. The research should be strengthened in extent and depth to transform the research outcomes to guide the actual practice.

关 键 词：分级诊疗 文献计量分析 论文 

分 类 号：R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]