没有《跋涉》,何来《生死场》——从萧红两部作品的研究与接受谈起  

Without Arduous Journey,Where the Field of Life and Death would be——The Study and Acceptance of Xiao Hong's Two Works

作　　者：王金茹[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]吉林师范大学学报编辑部,吉林四平136000 [2]吉林大学文学院,长春130012

出　　处：《白城师范学院学报》2017年第11期53-56,共4页Journal of Baicheng Normal University

基　　金：吉林省社会科学基金项目(2016B238);吉林省社会科学基金项目(2017B152)

摘　　要：萧红的《跋涉》和《生死场》分别写于1933年和1934年,从创作时间看,两部作品具有极大的关联性,但在萧红研究与接受史上,明显体现出《生死场》遮蔽了《跋涉》。没有《跋涉》,怎能有《生死场》?《跋涉》是《生死场》的序曲,更是奠基。学界对《跋涉》的关注明显不够。本文从这两部作品的研究与接受入手,分析二者所处境遇及其背后所蕴含的因素,认为《跋涉》是解读萧红创作不可忽略的一个起点。Xiao Hong's two works,Arduous Journey in 1933 and the Field of Life and Death in 1934 share the strong connection with the view of working time. However,in the history of study and acceptance,Arduous Journey is obviously covered by the Field of Life and Death. If the former work Arduous Journey was absent,where the Field of Life and Death would be. Arduous Journey is not only the overture of the Field of Life and Death,but also the foundation of it. Begin with the study and acceptance of these two works,this paper analyzes the different situations for each work and the reasons behind them. The author considers that Arduous Journey is a critical starting point to interpret Xiao Hong's works.

关 键 词：《跋涉》 《生死场》 批评 接受 

分 类 号：I207.42[文学—中国文学]