以实用主义为导向的我国《刑法》第二十八条重构论  

The Reconstruction of Article 28 in Criminal Law Based on the Utility Theory

作　　者：刘昊 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215000

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第1期23-29,共7页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

摘　　要：立法实效以立法实用为前提,实用之标准核心在于"规范的可适用性"。以裁判文书网为检索样本可以发现,我国《刑法》第二十八条关于胁从犯规定的适用率很低,其中主要原因在于传统刑法理论将胁从犯理解为"独立共犯种类",由此导致认定胁从犯过程中胁从犯所起到的作用认定和胁迫认定缺乏明确标准,进而模糊了胁从犯与紧急避险等阻却事由的界限。因此,有必要对以往"胁从犯废除论者"的观点予以辩证式的考察与借鉴,以期提高胁迫事实之于刑法的司法实用性。The practical effect of legislation is based on the practicality of legislation,and the core of practical standard lies in＂the applicability of norms＂.Take the case system of Supreme People＇s Court as analytical example,it can be found that the application rate of Article 28 of the Penal Code is very low.The main reason is that traditional criminal theory regards coerced accomplice as an＂independent accomplice species＂,which led to the lack of an clear standard of the role of coerced accomplice and the degree of duress in the process of constituting coerced accomplice.Thus blurred the boundaries among coerced accomplice and necessity etc.Therefore,it is necessary to didactically examine and learn from the viewpoints that advocate to abolish and improve the statue of coerced accomplice,which can help improve the judicial applicability of the coerced facts in criminal law.

关 键 词：胁从犯 实用性 废除论 情节 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]