检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周念琪
出 处:《新余学院学报》2018年第1期50-54,共5页Journal of Xinyu University
摘 要:在宪法层面上,对人格尊严的贬损和生育权的侵犯是代孕合法化面临的两大质疑。代孕现象对宪法学中"生育""母亲"等含义造成冲击,因而我国《宪法》第49条无法成为代孕合法化的宪法基础。然而,法律层面的缺漏与官方态度的否定,都无法阻止地下代孕市场的蔓延。这种缺乏管制的代孕市场,不仅激化社会矛盾,也违背宪法的价值追求。目前,有条件地承认代孕合法性是化解地下代孕市场造成的一系列矛盾纠纷的最佳方式。At the constitutional level, the derogatory treatment of human dignity and the violation of reproductive rights are two major challenges facing the legalization of surrogacy. Surrogacy phenomenon has an impact on the meaning of "childbearing" and "mother" in the constitutional law, so Article 49 of our Constitution can not become the constitutional basis for the legalization of surrogacy. Howev- er, the lack of law and official negation can not prevent the spread of the underground surrogacy market. This uncontrolled surrogate market not only intensifies social conflicts but also violates the constitutional pursuit of value. At present, the conditional recognition of the legitimacy of surrogacy is the best way to resolve a series of conflicts and disputes caused by the underground surrogacy market.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249