赔礼道歉与消除影响的适用研究——以1999—2015年互联网不正当竞争案件判决书为样本  

An Empirical Study on the Application of Apology and Elimination of Ill Effects in Internet Unfair Competition Cases——Based on Samples of Internet Unfair Competition Cases' Judgments during 1999—2015

作　　者：叶明[1] 陈耿华[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学经济法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第1期151-157,共7页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：2015年国家社科基金项目资助"互联网新型不正当竞争行为法律规制的实证研究"(15BFX125);2016年中国法学会青年调研项目资助(CLS(2016)Y12)

摘　　要：实证考察中国1999—2015年的互联网不正当竞争案件判决书发现,以最高人民法院为代表的司法机关在适用赔礼道歉、消除影响时比较混乱,存在请求主体不统一、适用条件及适用逻辑未厘清等问题。其重要原因是二者功能定位仍存困惑,且相关立法或空白、或不一致。为解决这两种责任形式适用混乱的问题,应重新界定赔礼道歉、消除影响的适用目的,并从请求主体、适用范围、适用限度及适用边界等多方面予以制度化,从而有效回应互联网竞争主体的正当诉求,规范互联网市场竞争秩序。An empirical study of the cases concerning internet unfair competition in our country during 1999-2015 finds that application of apology and elimination of ill effects is disorderly in judicial practice of judicial departments represented by the People＇s Supreme Court; the applicable subjects are inconsistent and the applicable conditions and logical relationships are not clear. The important reason is that their functional location is still unclear and legislation blank or inconsistent. To curb the confusing application situation, the purpose of application of apology and elimination of ill effects should be redefined and the applicable subjects, scope of application, limitation and applicable boundary should be made clear so as to respond to the legitimate demands of right subjects and regulate the competition order of the internet market.

关 键 词：赔礼道歉 消除影响 互联网不正当竞争 法律责任 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]