检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于鑫 刘加强[2] 房兵[3] 毛丽霞[2] 杨秩[2] 朱敏[2] 吴勇[2] 马旭辉[2] 孙良龚 袁玲君[3]
机构地区:[1]上海市口腔病防治院、复旦大学附属口腔医院口腔生物医学工程实验室、儿童口腔科,200001 [2]上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔颅颌面科正颌-正畸中心 [3]上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院上海市口腔医学重点实验室口腔正畸科 [4]上海市口腔病防治院、复旦大学附属口腔医院口腔生物医学工程实验室、正畸科,200001
出 处:《中华口腔正畸学杂志》2017年第4期204-207,共4页Chinese Journal of Orthodontics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(81671017,81371178)
摘 要:目的 探讨青春期下颌后缩伴关节盘前移关节紊乱患者、使用Herbst治疗下颌后缩的疗效.方法 选择43例10~15岁安氏Ⅱ类伴下颌后缩患者,26例是关节盘髁关系正常的患者(G1组),17例是伴有可复性关节盘前移位的患者(G2组);对治疗前后的头颅侧位片进行数据测量,研究上下颌骨、牙及牙槽关系在治疗前后的改变,以探讨Herbst矫治器前伸下颌后,下颌、牙及牙槽的生长改建.结果 采用配对t检验、分析两组治疗前后头影测量值的改变,U1-SN(G1组:-2.55±5.93,G2组:-8.62±7.45)、ANB值(G1组:-1.39±1.83,G2组:-1.48±1.58)、OJ值(G1组:-4.88±3.09,G2组:-5.08±2.88)均显著减小,Go-Co值(G1组:3.93±2.65,G2组:3.41±2.86)增加,颏前点位置均发生前移.采用独立样本f检验统计学分析,G2组较G1组U1SN值减小(P<0.006)、U1-L1角度的增加(P<0.003)均有显著性差异.其余指标无统计学差异.结论 Herbst矫治Ⅱ类下颌后缩,关节盘正常的患者下颌骨前移效果更为明显.Objective To investigate the effects of anterior disc displacement on Herbst in the treatment of mandibular retraction by using cephalometric.Methods Forty-three cases of 10-15 years old Class Ⅱ malocclusion with mandibular retrusion patients were chosed.Among them,26 cases with normal articular disc condyle relationship were included in group G1,and 17 cases with disc anterior displacement were included in group G2.By cephalometric analysis,we studied the changes of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible,teeth and alveolar relationship,and to investigate the growth modification in mandible,teeth and alveolar.after mandibular functional protrusion using the Herbst appliance.Results By cephalometric analysis using paired t test before and after treatment in the two groups,U1-SN(G1 group:-2.55±5.93,G2 group:-8.62±7.45)、ANB(G1group:-1.39 ± 1.85,G2 group:-1.48± 1.58) 、OJ(G1 group:-4.88±3.09,G2 group:-5.08 ± 2.88),the values after treatment were significantly reduced.Go-Co value was increased after treatment (G1grouPp:3.93± 2.65,G2 group:3.41 ± 2.86),pogonion position were moved forward.After statistical analysis using Independent-Samples t Test,the U1-SN value of G2 group was reduce significantly lower than G1 group (P〈0.006),and U1-L1 value increase more than G1 group (P〈0.003).There was no significant difference in other indexes.Conclusions The patients with Angle class Ⅱmalocclusion and mandibular retrusion with normal disc positions showed greater degree of mandibular advancement by treatment with Herbst.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.149.185